I don’t talk about it much; much of it was a long time ago. I wouldn’t say I’m lucky to be alive. I would say it was mostly skill, so I made it through some wild and deadly years. I didn’t think it was so unusual, but it was quite clear that it was an extraordinary life as I’ve grown older. But needless to say, I’ve had lots of guns pointed at me, and I’ve been shot at plenty of times. And I enjoy those kinds of things, so it disgusts me a lot to hear people being babies about how they fear for their lives when they are shot at. Police unions spend much of their lives defending dumb things that their members do, and they have cried wolf too much on the danger that police officers engage. As I said in the above video, I don’t relate to people who panic. I don’t panic about anything, and I never have, so all these police shootings that are happening on what mobs want to make into riots result from a loss of masculinity in the gunfighter process. There are lots of causes for it. But with all that said, we still need the police to protect law and order in our society. If the police make mistakes, I consider it collateral damage based on lousy training. I believe in this topic so much that I wrote a book called Tail of the Dragon, published about a decade ago now. My first book, The Symposium of Justice, published nearly two decades ago, was about this issue to a large extent also. So, I have some passionate thoughts about police efforts, the need for police and justice, and the kind of cool persona needed when in a firefight or a fistfight that requires a lot of experience.
I understand mistakes happen. I don’t understand the female cop who didn’t know she had a gun instead of a taser and accidentally killed the kid they were trying to arrest. I’m sure she feels terrible about it. Like many of these victims, the kid didn’t respect the police, which is a significant problem. Police are trained to subdue their arrestees no matter what. That power goes to the heads of a certain percentage of cops, and that is another problem. And the kind of training we give cops just doesn’t fit the circumstances. I’ve been to lots of gun classes and been around many gun users, and there is a tendency among them to overplay the danger of the weapons, which makes the gun users into panicky messes by the end of it. I prefer the stone-cold competence of the old cowboys who spent so much time with guns that they could spin them in their hands and never injure themselves or others while using firearms. I’m used to people who shoot in SASS and Cowboy Fast Draw who have guns as natural extensions of themselves, not some armed villain that might accidentally go off and kill people on a cross draw. The female cop should have never had a chambered weapon in her gun otherwise would have never mistaken a taser for a real gun ready to shoot. Yeah, I get it; mistakes happen, but these communist plotters who control these inner cities are looking to exploit every mistake for a change state in law enforcement, which is an even worse problem.
However, for context, everyone always says that until you know the raised heartbeat of chasing down some dangerous kid down a back alley who may be armed and ready to kill you, you don’t know what you’d do. Or some guy freaked out on drugs might resist arrest, meaning you need to use deadly force; I can relate. And it doesn’t bother me in the least. People then ask, well, why aren’t you a cop? My answer is that police are too structured for me, and they don’t make enough money. Doing a job for the thrill of it isn’t enough in a world full of options. But deadly encounters are not a deterrent, and there are plenty of people in the world who feel the same way. We need them as cops, not some of this progressive stuff we see today where we can’t discuss the necessity of courage in the workplace or the differences in the sexes. Instead, to avoid the discussion, we give aggressive police training and turn them loose politically ill-equipped for the political circumstances. And when corruption is detected, the police unions cover for their members, making the public suspect every deed was done with suspicion, which has, in the long run, worked against the police.
That’s where the parasite insurgents have come into the picture. They are using these political elements of policing, and the overreactions typical of most police encounters to their advantage whenever a mistake does happen. The people crying over all these black kids dying under police hands don’t care for anything about the black-on-black violence in Chicago every day and night. They don’t care about the many abortions that happen in black neighborhoods all year long. They don’t care about the gunning down of drugged-out thugs by police, only what they can exploit it for to gain political power. And that is the hard truth of the matter. It’s a shame, but that’s what we have before us. It’s not a problem that will solve itself, but one that must be identified, even if the admission is difficult.
Even with all that said, we must stand by our police. The system is imperfect because we are inspiring the wrong kind of people to work in law enforcement. The cool cats who have ice water in their veins are not going to the police academy. There is too much bureaucracy in police work, and people like that don’t have the patience for uniformed work. Who wants the rigidity of police work for payment under 70K? Not the kind of people born with ice water in their veins. But the power-hungry, the overdramatized attention getters, they do. I’ve had excellent friends who went on to become cops, and they made a game of pulling over young girls and making them exchange sexual favors to get out of tickets. Not something they are talking about in the mainstream news, but it happens in every community, and that is because we fail to distinguish the good from the bad and reward the tough and fearless. And in the wake, we end up with a mess. The communists and socialists in these black neighborhoods want to exploit these tragedies to collapse the American way of life. And the media is there to throw gas on the fire to help make it happen. They don’t wish to preserve law and order. They only cheer on the destruction of our nation and the laws that should bring peace but instead usher in an age of terror. It’s a path to hell paved with good intentions, and despite the trouble, we must stand by the cops because it is evident that nobody else will. They need us more than ever and should not be penalized because of their terrible training in the arts of panic rather than courage.
As I have been pointing out, Democrats are simply looters who steal other people’s ideas to cover for their massive corruption. They certainly have done this with the racism issue, which is exclusively their problem. They created it. And they are and have been for decades involved in the cover-up. Now that they have a disastrous first quarter of a Biden first term, they are looking to steal another Trump idea, the troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. Of course, for Trump’s original targets of getting America out of Afghanistan, he knew that the support for the long 20-year war chasing after a fake Taliban threat was to support a military-industrial complex and economy of defense spending. Suggesting that the moment US Troops would leave, that Afghanistan would fall into chaos is just another lie. It was a lie created on behalf of perpetually keeping wars going so that investors could know where to spend their money to make millions then donate that money to the politicians who made it all happen to begin with. There was never a goal of the Afghanistan War. It was simply to send troops somewhere to do something while the drug trade flourishes around the world from the inhospitable country intent to poison the world with its narcotics products. It was never about terrorism. The terrorism created the urgency to do something in that region that could justify spending massive amounts of money on feeling good about something.
Yet, it’s a great example that the government cannot be trusted by the voters who put them in office. All you need to do is compare how politicians reacted to Trump wanting to withdraw from Afghanistan and then their very passive and even supportive reaction to Joe Biden wishing to do the same. Of course, Republicans are against the idea. They were when Trump wanted to do it, and they don’t like it that Biden wants to, although they are much less vocal about it ironically. But it’s Democrats who have been most notably schizophrenic about it. That shouldn’t be a surprise. However, it does provide a noticeable difference. In 2020, as Trump was speaking about withdrawing from Afghanistan, the world was coming to an end. Now fast forward into the first quarter of 2021, suddenly America has been there for over 20 years, and now its time to bring them home. Democrats like the idea, and so does the media. Strange how that happens.
It would be nice if Democrats were sincere about their cares for the troops, but as we all know, that isn’t the reason. Instead, Democrats under the Biden administration have put themselves in a lot of trouble. The Hunter Biden story didn’t have long legs, and Democrats need a diversion from their intentions of court-packing. High taxes on infrastructure, their full embrace of the communist Green New Deal. The war that is brewing with Ukraine and Russia, think about that one. The Biden’s have business payoffs from Ukraine, and Democrats have used Russia as the excuse for how Trump managed to break through the political firewall of global cabals who try to run all politics through financial support. And now Russia knows the Biden administration is compromised and weak. They dance from the fingers of China, whom Russia has now aligned themselves with, so no matter how much money from Ukraine the Bidens have received, the new administration can’t afford to put its foot down. Russia knows it. Yet Democrats continue to talk about how Russia compromised Trump for help in getting elected in 2016. What they don’t tell you is that it was the Democrats who owe Russia for allowing themselves to be a punching bag of their incompetency while all this has been brewing. And now for Russia, it’s payday. They want Ukraine back.
There is more corruption, too; people are not buying Covid anymore, so the Democrats lose that mask of panic which has allowed them to gain so much power. Few people trust the CDC anymore, which carried the Biden administration back to a mock election. And the corporate commanders at Twitter and Facebook are losing their grip on information flow. Conservative outlets are coming on now; we are not all one country. Liberals have their entertainment. Conservatives have their own. We all don’t share movies, sports, and television shows anymore. Liberals have successfully, unintentionally, of course, driven a wedge in our entertainment culture, and people are on their separate sides now. And those conservative sides aren’t buying the election fraud that took away their President in Trump. People are very resentful of the role media played in stealing the election through many methods. The Biden people know they are falsely elected and that there is tremendous pressure that much of the American population knows it. So why not steal a Trump action with Afghanistan in hopes to heal the ill-will? That is undoubtedly a factor in this withdrawal.
The Biden people are suffering through what it feels like to build a lie on top of a lie on top of a lie until the whole cake starts sliding off itself into collapse. The Biden administration is a corporate concoction that thought it could rule by consensus and finance. But what is now missing from the world is authentic leadership, the kind of leadership Trump brought to the presidency. The world had been waiting for an opportunity toward corruption once again. So, of course, they hated Trump and his voters. They lied, cheated, and manipulated themselves back into power, and now they have it. But, they have to live up to the promises, and they are collapsing under the pressure of needed performance, and they can’t do it. All they can do is copy off what was working and hope people stop looking at them.
That’s what everyone needs to know about the Afghanistan withdrawal plans. It’s as phony as the Biden administration is. If anybody cared to withdraw from Afghanistan, they would have done it during the eight years that Obama was in office. But of course, Republicans got their industrial complex concerns addressed with the continued war, and Democrats were able to protect the drug trade in that country from poisoning the world under the protection of the US military. Everyone was happy until that mean old Trump came along and wanted to take the troops out of the politics, and the world threatened to meltdown in reaction. However, now that the shoe is on the other foot, Democrats need a diversion. They hope that it will last longer than the pornography of the President’s son plastered all over the internet with his weiner hanging out and displaying his decaying teeth destroyed by drug abuse. That is, after all, what kind of product comes out of President Biden. His son is a perfect caricature of his corrupt life, and now we are supposed not to see those things as all their plans came apart so soon in the new administration. These are, after all, not the days of old where empty promises would be enough. These days, especially after Trump, people expect results. Instead, all they have so far is a disaster of an administration, and pulling the troops out of Afghanistan won’t cover that up.
It is one of the most misunderstood concepts of our society. I am going through the editorial process with a publisher on a book on this topic called The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business. Still, we need to address the difference between a leader and a politician for our case here today. Because obviously, most people don’t know the difference. Every day in the news, somebody talks about Joe Biden as if he’s our “leader,” even Tucker Carlson on Fox News. There is a treacherous psychological mind trick going on here that is costing us a lot of national bandwidth that we need to straighten out because we are different in America than other places globally, and we need to understand why. We don’t elect leaders into office in the United States. We don’t make an effort to be led by titles. Remember, unlike what everyone tells us, we are not a Democracy; we are a Republic. And we elect people to represent our views in America. Not to lead us, leadership is scarce, and when we find them, we like them. But we can’t limit our scope to always waiting for some leader to emerge before leaving the campfire and exploring the nearest cave the way leader-driven cultures tend to do. We built our country to assume that leadership would be hard to find and was very rare, so leadership wasn’t needed in the political class. We just needed representatives to carry out the interests of the people who elected them, which is a vast difference from what we are told.
As I talk about in my upcoming book, leadership is forged like gold from the massive pressures of the universe. Not everyone has the stomach or the heart to be a leader. Typically we don’t see leaders emerging in our political circles because the conditions for making a leader do not exist there. We see them come about in military life to some extent, we see them in sports, but most of our leadership in America comes about in the business world. The percentage of authentic leadership is noticeably low; it’s a fraction of the total percentage of an overall population. For example, Tom Brady is a prominent leader in sports. He makes his coaching staff better with his leadership and teammates no matter what team he’s on. Tom Brady manages always to find success. You can see that type of leadership in CEOs, such as Steve Jobs. Modern-day Elon Musk has excellent leadership. It’s not the money he has which exhibits it, but it’s in his long string of successes and how he can communicate complicated vision to many people. Of course, when we think of leadership, we think of General Patton. I think of Claire Lee Chennault, who created the great Flying Tigers. But these are all names unique to the history and within our populations. They are far from commonplace.
The health of any culture should always be measured by the number of leaders it produces. But for that to occur, you have to understand what a leader is, and by calling politicians leaders by their titles, or worthless CEOs who expect to lead by title, then we are kidding ourselves toward the objectives of success, in a healthy culture that proportionally, America is the best globally. We have our Tom Brady types coming out of leisure activities and our Elon Musks in science and industry. Other countries don’t have those people. It’s not because the skills aren’t in the population. But those cultures do not have a means of emerging them from obscurity into change state contributors, just as Indians of the Wild West spent much of their lives walking over gold but having no means to bring it out of the ground. And even if they did get to it, what would they have done with it? They had no economy to make money. They had no concept of money, so they never extracted gold for sociological use. There needs to be a means to bring about the treasures of existence, and if that culture does not develop those means, you will never get to the prize. That is what leadership is; it’s a treasure of human endeavor that can advance a society when it is found and utilized. But it is not created by silly titles, which is the prevailing belief by those too lazy and ill-equipped to develop a culture that produces leadership.
If we recognized that simple leadership trait, we would eliminate much of the corruption we see in politics currently and in the past and future. Because we have by default given out leadership designations to people by title and not merit, we have prevented authentic leadership from emerging and improving our lives and circumstances. Back to Tom Brady, think of all the professional football players we have seen over the years. But not until Tom Brady came along was the whole leadership package developed into a guy who had taken his football teams to so many Super Bowls and won when the surrounding players were all different, and even the teams were different. Tom Brady is proof that it’s not teams that win big games; it’s one individual who is a true leader. Socialist and Communist countries always fail because they have no interest in finding leadership. They have built their entire societies around collective consensus instead of leadership. That is undoubtedly the case of our institutions of learning and our government of today in general. They think leadership comes out of group behavior when it is forged from the pressure of success and failure—through much pain and turmoil and a refusal to take the loss as an answer to living.
By calling any political person a leader, we are cheapening the word for its true meaning and use. It is worse than all that it is a general punt by a declining society to be so quick to call worthless people leaders because the culture desires to shift away responsibility for leadership to people with titles instead of hashing out the problems themselves. They might fail in the task if they did try, but by not trying and giving the responsibility over to a titled person who does not have leadership, but is like Mitch McConnell, a politician in a high office, then a failure shouldn’t come as a surprise. Mitch McConnell will never be a leader of anybody. Joe Biden will never be a leader, nor is Vice President Commie Harris. Skin color can’t make a person a leader. Bootlicking doesn’t make a leader. Diversity training won’t make a leader, so globalism will ultimately fail because they seek to suppress leaders in favor of a system that makes politicians by title into positions of authority without earning the right through the pressures of living and becoming the best, thus creating leadership.
Not understanding leadership has led to many of the problems we see today and destroys the lives of those unable to see leadership for the value it brings. But make no mistake, just because someone wins an election, it does not make them a leader. Just because someone gets a promotion, it does not make them magically a leader. Not even a Super Bowl can do it; in the case of Tom Brady, he has shown that you must win many Super Bowls under many different conditions to show the power of leadership. But without these tests and high expectations, you get sorry performance and a culture destined for failure. And that is the danger of calling worthless politicians leaders when they are only haphazard politicians who represent us in politics at best.
I do not believe that Karl Marx intended to deliver the most evil political philosophy known to the human mind on purpose. It would appear that Marx, being the helpless, poverty-stricken despot that he was, wished to become powerful as he looked about Europe and saw the classes of those above him. He knew he would never reach any lofty social heights in his lifetime without stealing some of that influence from the bourgeoisie class. Marx did not have the benefit of living in America where the closest form of a socially classless society existed. If he did live in America, he might not have died with only 11 mourners at his funeral leaving behind a wife, and life of extreme poverty. Yet Marx and his writing were discovered by the intellectual elite, and even newspaper editors in America were giving voice to Marx and his writing partner on The Communist Manifesto Friedrich Engels because they sensed correctly that the plight of the poor and down trodden was the path to power. The intellectual elite knew they were too weak for actual battle and sought to utilize a mob of peasants to capture political control from the kings, queens, and the nobility of Europe. Intellectuals for centuries had been looking for a philosophy to bring about the utopian vision of a society created by Sir Thomas More in his book Utopia published in 1516. Marx, with all the foolish innocence of a beggar placed ideas to paper and the intellectual classes used him to gain power over Europe in the middle 1850’s. What followed was a century of death, destruction, and the near eradication of human innovation globally. Marx brought to the world decay in the form of his political philosophy called Marxism, which morphed into socialism maturing into communism, and all the gains made in America advancing the spirit of the human species had found its destroyer.
Today Presidents like Obama do not call themselves Marxists, socialists, or communists—they term it progressives. School teachers, politicians of both parties, many media personalities, actors, actresses, producers, music industry tycoons, and even Wall Street Bankers consider themselves “progressive” yet have their roots directly tied to the work of Karl Marx. To see the evidence, all one has to do is look in their neighborhoods and the evidence of “collectivism” will be seen in great abundance. Collectivism is an evil of thoughtless enterprise. No one brain controls this evil, its methods of destruction are generated from a collective belief that all participants are moved by a “will” that transcends thought, so mob will rules through democratic participation. Marx sought the complete eradication of private property so that every member of society could work according to their capacities and consume according to their needs. To his way of thinking, this was the only way to prevent the rich from living at the expense of the poor. Since he was so terribly poor, he was concerned about “leveling” the playing field so people like him could have a say in his fate. After all, he could not afford property of his own, and he obviously lacked the will to obtain it himself. So he built a philosophy that allowed for the legal theft of other people’s property so that at least they would not have more than he did. Communism became the philosophy of the lazy; those who would rather take from others so that they could not have more than the communists did as if such a thing could justify the communist’s lack of ambition.
I saw communism in full bloom just the other day as I was on my way to the Kings Island Amusement Park in Mason, Ohio. A large complex of apartments had sprung up out of the only ground left in Mason from which to build called The Palmera. These are high-end, luxury apartments which would be expected in Mason, perfectly located to take advantage of the excellent Mason Schools, local shopping, and highway access. At first glance it would seem nice to offer renters a chance to move into the community of Mason at a fraction of the cost property would garner of the same quality, but that is until one thinks about election time. Apartment dwellers are notoriously vociferous to pass school levies when a public school asks for higher taxes, because the apartment dweller does not directly pay the taxes, the apartment owner does, yet the apartment dweller does get to send their child to school for free. So they almost always vote in favor of school levies, because they don’t have to pay the tax increase directly—someone else does. This is the Marx idea of forcing on society “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” Since the apartment owner is rich enough to build an apartment complex, they are rich enough to pay the taxes required by the “needs” of the community.
Nobody involved in this scam would call themselves a communist, and most of them probably never read Karl Marx. But over time, the education elite who did read Marx gradually encouraged all involved to just accept these communist ideas as a reality. The school is doing its part in destroying private property by gradually increasing taxes to the point of discouraging ownership. Administers of the community through regulation control the owners of the apartment dwelling allowing them to participate in the upper class of district management so long as they generate taxes without question, and the tax payers have learned not to question anything for fear that the IRS might audit them, so they keep a low profile and allow communism to spread gradually replacing capitalism as the economic engine of The United States.
Marx’s basic premise is that socio-economic statuses for different groups, the proletariat and the bourgeois ruling classes are defined by their relationship to private property and the means of production. Marx believed as many long-haired, dirty, grimy, tree hugging hippies believe to this very day that by eradicating this relationship of property that peace on earth will finally be realized. It’s an excessively naive view of the world, and has failed time and time again due to the fact that such a society always requires administrators, and those administrators always attempt to rule through dictatorship. In the case of the Palmera Apartments in Mason, the apartment dweller, (the non-owners) gain enormous voting power because of their sheer numbers. The bureaucrats of Mason City government get to impose fees on the developer of the apartment and keep a leash on their control of their own property so to best serve the apartment dwellers. These fees pay their administrative costs, but also keep the developer from gaining too much personal power.
Governments in general all have a tendency toward socialism, because they function as a collective, not as individuals responsible for their own thoughts and action. The blob mentality of no property ownership, no ownership of ideas, or even of personal relationships are destroying the human race, and it can all be hung presently on the gutter bum, Karl Marx and his legions of leeching intellectuals. In The United States the government sued Microsoft for having a monopoly, to gain control of a company becoming too big and powerful. Today, that company is only a fraction of what it once was. And now Facebook has been artificially propped up by government so that it can tear it down again and take away from people the freedom enjoyed there. Facebook as I’m writing this is being attacked by government to level the playing field for others, and to gain control of the business. The behavior is more reminiscent of communism than capitalism, because the administrators of our economy are tampering with the ownership of assets in order to facilitate who does what according to their abilities, and who needs what according to their needs. Those determinations are made by the “collective,” by the mobs of the masses and it is sheer evil. Evil because the mob can determine what someone else does with their property. In the case of the Palmera Apartments the building code administrators and local school will decide the costs of the project. Up front the code people do. But after the apartments are built, the schools can increase their cost by raising taxes at the will of the mob. The owner will then have to decide to absorb the cost increase of the taxes, or raise their rental rates, which might push out the apartment dwellers because the apartments will then become too expensive. The intent of the mob is that by using communism, the apartment owner is forced to surrender their profits, their means of production, to the “collective.”
Marx wrote “In place of religious and political illusions, the bourgeoisie had substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation. Charter that had once protected people’s freedom had been cast aside for one unconscionable freedom—free trade.” Those are the words of a man with no products in his mind to sell, and possessing the lack of will to work in order to do so. Those are the words of a beggar on the side of a street with his hat out in hopes of a hand out. You can hear the same types of words today as communism comes from the mouth of President Obama. One of his biggest knocks on Mitt Romney is that Romney made money at Bain Capital and is a “rich guy.” This comment only has merit in the context of thousands of voters who have been trained to be communists in their public educations by teachers who embraced Karl Marx with passion—because as we know—those who can’t do in real life teach. So they seek communism to disguise their lack of talent and personal ambition. This was the path of Obama, a dope smoking, fatherless youth looking for answers in an unfair world. As a college kid he hung out with Marxist lovers and ministers who looked with envious eyes at those who they considered their betters. These parasites schemed ways of using the collective to bring down those who towered above them by using the communism of Karl Marx. Obama who has no experience in making money of any kind, and has become wealthy by looting as a public official can only give jobs away that the American taxpayer creates. Romney actually created jobs in the private sector, but to the communist that is a sin, because the private sector means, “ownership,” which to them is the ultimate evil. They think in this fashion because they have been seduced by communism.
Another one of Karl Marx’s famous quotes is that “the abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for real happiness.” Communists in our own country working at first through the ACLU and labor unions sought to remove any content of religion from our schools and courtrooms, out of dedication to that Marx quote. Even though many of them would not consider themselves communists, their behavior as a collective dictates the will by the mob, which is the foundation of communism. Just by functioning as a collective, they function as a communist.
Karl Marx is far more prevalent in the life of the average American than they’d like to believe. Communism has many spokesman, many more than capitalism, because in capitalism it is the will of the individual that it serves, and thus all individuals prosper. But in communism, it is the collective will of the mob that rules and the individuals are consumed within its destructive fires to become advocates of doom believing they are freedom fighters. But the only freedom they are fighting is the freedom to think, do, and own property as one may wish. The collectivists of communism are seeking to eradicate freedom all together in a utopian pursuit of peace on earth, even if it means killing the people who stand in their way of peace.
Every time I hear a person of supposedly high intellect profess that they believe that Karl Marx was a genius, I instantly see before me a lazy slob who is afraid of their own shadow, a social parasite of the highest order. I see a destroyer of mankind. I see a would be slave master as they would just as soon put on the shackles of serfdom in order to save the lives of the masses with a complacent slow death putting out the fires of personal liberty in exchange for mass sacrifice to mother earth. The attempt to slowly warm Americans up to communism is in 2012 an unbridled sickness.
Cincinnati’s mayor Mark Malory has been heavily involved with communist Chinese governments and even my district school of Lakota has been working with Chinese schools to bridge the gaps in understanding between the two countries. China has no intention on bending its communist philosophies more than they have with the 1997 inclusion of Hong Kong back to the motherland—a capitalist city being reintroduced to the communist mainland. The attempts by modern China to work with American political leaders and public schools are to assist in the global process of bringing America into the fold of red communism and away from capitalism entirely. The goal of communist China and communist Russia, and socialist Greece, France, and Spain as well as communist Vietnam, communist North Korea etc., is to bring down the bourgeoisie nation of America as a whole, to level the world’s playing field by mowing down The United States and its powerful economy.
The communist infestation in America has been going on for many years, and many who are reading this right now will want to call me a conspiracy theorists and a right-winged radical. But those names come from the communist in you, which has been bred through your school, your job, your family, your politics, and your fractured economy. It has been bred into you by the enemies of America long ago, before your birth, and they have guided your mind to the work of a bearded, broke fool living in London, England as he wrote his masterwork of communism, Das Kapital influencing the catastrophic economist John Meynard Keynes. It would be Keynesian economics that would put The United States into a spiral of debt and create irrational economic models that would destroy capitalism, create large central planning bureaucracies intent on the spread of Europe’s beloved communism.
Like all parasites communism lays dormant within the culture of it’s pray until the time is right to leap forth and destroy the entity of its feeding. In America, we have for too long fed without knowledge this phantom menace, this prophet of doom known as Karl Marx who planted the seeds of our destruction within our intellectual class, the teacher, the professor, and the media tycoons who grew up listening to the rants of Jane Fonda and her naked body crawling all over our imaginations preaching the seduction of communism. It’s here before us, it’s feeding off of us, and if we don’t put a stop to it, it will destroy us completely with no care for the lives that made up our individual endeavors. We will be sacrificed by communism to the gods of collectivism to serve the blood thirsty desires of a mob intent on its own destruction, thoughtless, blind, and manipulated by lack of personal responsibility toward a great swarm of parasites striving to live for one more moment before their ceaseless hunger consumes itself.
Politicians learned from Hollywood how to build their image into a celebrity appeal, and the same Hollywood producers and image makers who create the images we see, seem to not recognize that the looting politician is simply using the Hollywood strategy against Hollywood itself to gain money, and political influence within the organization.
Special note to the Secret Service, and Homeland Security employees reading this right now, make yourself and the money we are paying you useful by reading the whole thing. Maybe you’ll learn something.
It is for postings like this one that the government has initiated PIPA when the Senate returns from the holiday recess, and SOPA by sponsor Rep. Lamar Smith [R, TX-21], who held a marathon, 15+ hour mark-up session on the bill which attempts to shut down websites that are critical of the government. The government in all branches know they have overstepped their boundaries and are now attempting to gain control of the free flow of information. As shown clearly on this article, it is these very people who have acted against the United States, and now they wish to hide that information from voters.
“The fact that I support this bill as a whole does not mean I agree with everything in it,”he said in Hawaii, where he is spending his vacation. “I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation and prosecution of suspected terrorists.”
